Scientists have found a planet about the size of Earth that is constantly exposed to radiation; its atmosphere has long since corroded away, leaving it bare. While astronomers are not interested in life as we know it because they might be able to study the geology of a planet outside our solar system for the first time, life as we know it cannot live on this scorching planet.
SPECULOOS-3 b, the newly discovered exoplanet, is a rocky planet located around 55 light-years away from Earth. Days and nights on the planet are limitless, but it zips around its host star every 17 hours. Similar to how the moon is to Earth, astronomers believe the planet is tidally locked to its star. The nightside is imprisoned in perpetual darkness, while a single dayside is always directed toward the star.
The exoplanet’s star, a red dwarf star approximately the size of Jupiter that is 7 billion years old, regularly emits radiation that causes the planet to heat up to Venus-like levels, according to telescope measurements. According to scientists’ latest analysis, which was published on May 15 in the journal Nature Astronomy, whatever atmosphere that the planet may have had may have easily gone into space long ago and left behind a sizzling boulder that was devoid of air.
“Life as we know it could not emerge on the surface of the planet—atmosphere or not—because it could not sustain large amounts of water in liquid form,” said Michaël Gillon, the primary author of the study and an astronomer at the University of Liège in Belgium, to Live Science. “It is a bare rock planet like Mercury.”
The researchers stated that although though SPECULOOS-3 b is uninhabitable by life, it is sufficiently close to Earth to allow for in-depth investigations on its chemical composition, which could determine whether the planet was ever geologically active.
For example, future observations with the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) will be able to verify whether or not volcanoes have erupted on the planet. That might shed light on how rocky planets, such as SPECULOOS-3 b, originate around dim, luminous stars and whether some of them are potentially habitable even though they are near their sun.
Gillon stated that the team “searched intensively” for planetary siblings of SPECULOOS-3 b in the same solar system but was unable to locate any. He mentioned the possibility that those extra planets exist, but they are either too small or too far away from their host star to be visible.
Around a Cold Star is a Hot Planet
Since 2011, Gillon and his associates have used a network of six telescopes dispersed around Chile, the Canary Islands, and Mexico to identify SPECULOOS-3 b. The network is known as the Search for Planets Eclipsing Ultra-Cool Stars, or SPECULOOS. Its name is derived from a spiced shortbread from Belgium that is typically presented to kids on December 6th in honor of St. Nicholas Day.
Finding rocky planets around ultracool dwarf stars, whose small size makes it simpler for telescopes to find planets in orbit, is the primary objective of the project. Not only are they hundreds of times dimmer and thousands of degrees colder than the sun, but they also burn up their fuel slowly and have a much longer lifespan—roughly 100 billion years. (When the sun dies in around 4.5 billion years, it will be about 10 billion years old.)
Remarkably, “they are expected to be the last stars still shining in the universe,” stated Amaury Triaud, the co-author of the study and an exoplanetology professor at the University of Birmingham in England. According to the experts, their exceptionally long lifespans provide windows of opportunity for life to arise on planets within their systems.
Nevertheless, it is challenging to examine them due to their great faintness. A SPECULOOS robotic telescope in Mexico monitored telltale dips in the host star’s light constantly for five nights in 2021 in order to find SPECULOOS-3 b. The study discovered that the first indications of the orbiting newfound planet appeared then and were verified a year later.
“There would be no blue sky or clouds if there is no atmosphere — it would just be dark, like on the surface of the moon,” MIT research scientist and study co-author Benjamin Rackham stated in a different MIT statement. “And the ‘sun’ would be a big, purplish-red, spotted, and flaring star that would look about 18 times as big as the sun looks to us in the sky.”
According to Gillon, SPECULOOS-3 b is the project’s ninth discovery of this kind of planet, and many more should be discovered in the years to come. The newly discovered SPECULOOS-3 b “is an excellent target for JWST,” according to Gillon, similar to the planets previously spotted by the project, including a family of seven in the well-known TRAPPIST-1 system, some of which are thought to be possibly habitable.
“With this world, we could basically start doing exoplanetary geology,” MIT assistant professor of planetary sciences and research co-author Julien de Wit stated in a release regarding the MIT study. “How cool is that?”
In India, one of the top automakers is Tata Motors. They are developing new products to add to their portfolio in addition to the wide range of products they now offer. Another well-known brand in EVs is Tata.
Tata Nexon iCNG
Right now, one of the most well-liked small SUVs offered in India is the Nexon. With their twin-cylinder technology, which provides the comfort of CNG without sacrificing trunk room, Tata completely changed the CNG market. Tata debuted the Tigor iCNG AMT and Tiago AMT iCNG in a similar manner.
Tata debuted the Nexon SUV using compressed natural gas (CNG) at this year’s Bharat Mobility Expo. It is anticipated that the launch will take place later this year. The Nexon will be the first turbocharged car with a factory-installed CNG kit when it is released. A 1.2-liter, 3-cylinder turbocharged petrol engine will power the SUV; this engine will provide less power and torque than the standard petrol variant. Additionally, it is anticipated that the CNG variant will cost at least 1 lakh more than the comparable petrol version.
Tata Altroz Racer
They originally came upon this idea at the Auto Expo the previous year. What the Hyundai i20 N Line is to Tata, the Altroz Racer is to Hyundai. It is a more aggressively styled variant of the standard luxury hatchback. A few times, the Altroz Racer has been seen testing, and pictures of the vehicle are also accessible on the internet.
The 1.2-liter turbocharged petrol engine powering the premium hatchback will remain the same, but it will produce more power than before. The Altroz Racer is anticipated to produce 120 PS when mated to a 6-speed manual gearbox. The standard iTurbo variant has five gears and produces 10 PS less.
The roof, tailboard and bonnet of the Altroz Racer are all blacked out. A tint of red or orange is used to complete the remainder of the body. To give it a sporty appearance, the bonnet has white racing stripes. All of the standard Altroz’s features are anticipated to be available in the automobile. Additionally, it will have front ventilated seats, a first for the sector. Along with many other features, it will have a HUD, six airbags, and a 360-degree camera.
Tata Curvv
Tata has been hinting at this brand-new product for a while now. The Tata Curvv mid-size SUV concept and near-production model were viewed by them at the Auto Expo the previous year. The SUV is anticipated to go into production and be released in the next months. It has been observed undergoing testing on local roads multiple times. It is anticipated that the SUV would arrive during the holiday season.
Tata is anticipated to release the Curvv’s electric variant first. As a result, Tata will outperform competitors like the Maruti eVX and Creta EV. The future Tata Curvv’s technical characteristics are yet unknown.
Additionally, Tata plans to introduce an ICE Curvv with a choice of petrol or diesel engines. The SUV will be powered by a brand-new 1.2-liter turbocharged gasoline engine with 125 PS and a choice of manual or automatic transmissions. The 1.5-liter turbocharged engine in the diesel variant will be available with both a manual and an automatic gearbox. To compete, Tata Curvv will be equipped with a number of high-end features. It is anticipated that Curvv’s ICE version will be released by early 2025 or by the end of 2024.
In the US, Toyota’s small and mid-size trucks and SUVs are quite well-liked.With a new hybrid V6 engine, the full-size 2024 Sequoia is a very capable and contemporary Toyota SUV that is also regarded for its dependability. On the other hand, one of the most well-liked full-size SUVs available is the 2024 Chevrolet Tahoe. The 2024 Chevy Tahoe is an extremely capable SUV with remarkable interior and cargo volume.
Performance And Capability
In 2023, Toyota discontinued the V8 engine with the release of the third-generation Sequoia. A 3.4-liter V6 turbocharged engine paired with Toyota’s iForce-Max hybrid system powers the 2024 Sequoia. A 1.87 kWh nickel-metal hydride battery pack and a 48 hp AC permanent magnet synchronous electric motor power the V6 motor.
Three engine options are available for the 2024 Chevrolet Tahoe: the standard 5.3-liter EcoTec3 V8, the bigger 6.2-liter EcoTec3 V8, and a 3.0-liter inline-6 turbodiesel engine that produces a lot of torque.
Base Powertrain Comparison
2024 Toyota Sequoia
2024 Chevrolet Tahoe
Make
Toyota
Chevrolet
Model
Sequoia
Tahoe
Engine/Motor
3.4-Liter Twin Turbo Hybrid V6
3.0L I-6 Turbodiesel/5.3L V-8/6.2L V-8
Horsepower
437 HP
277/355/420 HP
Torque
583 LB-FT
460/383/460 LB-FT
Drivetrain
4×2 / 4×4
4×2 / 4×4
Transmission
10-speed automatic
10-Speed AT
MSRP
$61,275-79,110
$58,195
The hybrid V8 engine in the Sequoia produces 437 horsepower and 583 lb-ft of torque combined. The Tahoe’s 5.3-liter V8 engine is tuned to provide 355 horsepower and 383 lb-ft of torque. The most potent is the bigger 6.2-liter V8, which produces 460 lb-ft of torque and 420 horsepower. With 460 lb-ft of torque and 277 horsepower, the 3.0-liter turbodiesel in the Tahoe is the least potent engine.
When compared to the Chevrolet Tahoe, the Toyota SUV is more potent and produces more torque. Standard on the Sequoia and Tahoe are 10-speed automatic transmissions with 4×2 and 4×4 powertrain options.
Fuel Economy
The Sequoia’s new hybrid V6 engine with 4×2 is EPA-rated for 22 combined miles per gallon of fuel efficiency. The Sequoia can get 21 MPG in the city and 24 MPG on the interstate. Conversely, the Duramax diesel 4×2 vehicles are the most fuel-efficient Chevrolet Tahoe variant, with a total fuel economy of up to 24 MPG, including 21 MPG in the city and 28 MPG on the highway. In the city, the Tahoe and Sequoia are similarly efficient, but the Chevy benefits from having a diesel engine.
Model
Toyota Sequoia
Chevrolet Tahoe
Engine
3.4-Liter V6 Hybrid 4×2
3.0-Liter, 6-Cylinder, Diesel, 4×2
City
21 MPG
21 MPG
Highway
24 MPG
28 MPG
Combined
22 MPG
24 MPG
Toyota Sequoia Vs. Chevrolet Tahoe Towing And Off-Road Capability
The Toyota Sequoia has a maximum towing capacity of 9,520 pounds and a maximum payload capacity of 1,730 pounds when outfitted correctly. On the other hand, a properly outfitted Chevrolet Tahoe has a 1,834-pound payload capacity and can tow up to 8,400 pounds. Features for trailer assistance are available on both the Sequoia and Tahoe.
The Toyota Sequoia has a maximum towing capacity of 9,520 pounds and a maximum payload capacity of 1,730 pounds when outfitted correctly. On the other hand, a properly outfitted Chevrolet Tahoe has a 1,834-pound payload capacity and can tow up to 8,400 pounds. Features for trailer assistance are available on both the Sequoia and Tahoe.
Towing And Payload Capacities
Toyota Sequoia
Chevrolet Tahoe
Towing Capacity
8,980-9,520 lbs
8,400 lbs
Payload
1,435-1,730 lbs
1,834 lbs
Off-Road Capability
The most capable model for off-roading is the Sequoia TRD Pro. The 2024 Sequoia TRD Pro comes with an electronic locking rear differential, an auto limited-slip differential, underbody skid plates, 18-inch all-terrain tyres, a 2-speed transfer case with high/low range, and an off-road suspension tuned by TRD with Fox shock absorbers and a 2-inch lift. With the raise package and updated front and rear bumpers, the Sequoia can achieve maximum ground clearance of 9.1 inches and approach and departure angles of 23 degrees.
The Z71 trim is the most off-road competent trim for the Tahoe. The Tahoe Z71 is equipped as standard with adaptive air suspension, an electronic limited-slip differential, 20-inch wheels with all-terrain tyres, underbody protection metal skid plates, and magnetically controlled shock absorbers in addition to four-wheel drive and a two-speed transfer case with low and high range. The Tahoe Z71’s approach angle of 34.5 degrees and departure angle of 22.5 degrees are both enhanced by the redesigned front design. Ten inches of ground clearance are provided by the Tahoe Z71.
Off-Road Specifications
Vehicle
Toyota Sequoia
Chevrolet Tahoe
Approach Angle
23 degrees
34.5 degrees
Breakover Angle
NA
NA
Departure Angle
20 degrees
22.5 Degree
Ground Clearance
8.6-9.1 inches
10 inches
Interior Design And Technology
Toyota updated the interior of the third generation Sequoia to make it appear incredibly modern, large, durable, and fresh. Even for young children, getting in and out of the Toyota SUV is made simple by the spacious door apertures and side stairs. The Sequoia’s three rows are roomy and welcoming. For lengthy trips, though, the Grand Highlander might be a better fit for transporting passengers. The materials have a high-end feel to them and the dashboard design is visually striking. The knobs, switches, and buttons are incredibly simple to operate because to their clear labelling and organisation. The touchscreen is simple to use and the driver’s gauge cluster is easily adjustable.
Comparatively speaking, the fifth-generation Tahoe’s interior is just as well-equipped as the Sequoia’s. The first, second, and third rows of seats all have plenty of headroom, and the wide door openings make it simple to enter and exit. Many adjustments are available for the steering wheel and driver’s seat to accommodate different types of drivers. Although there is excellent sight, it is challenging to see what is directly ahead due to the lofty front end. Nevertheless, the layout of the dashboard is not user-friendly since a push-button gear shifter positioned on the dash required the relocation of numerous controls, which made it challenging to access the other controls.
Sequoia vs. Tahoe Technology Comparison
The larger 14-inch infotainment system is standard on higher trim levels of the Sequoia SR5, while the base model has an 8-inch touchscreen. With a wireless smartphone charging station, both screens are compatible with wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto. An 8-speaker audio system is also available for the base model, while the Platinum model and up can accommodate the JBL 14-speaker system. Higher trim levels come with a fully digital driver’s gauge cluster and a driver’s head-up display.
The 2024 Tahoe comes equipped with a standard 8-inch infotainment touchscreen, wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, a six-speaker audio system, and front and second-row USB connections. A larger 10.2-inch infotainment touchscreen, a wireless smartphone charging pad, a nine- or ten-speaker Bose audio system, a fully digital instrument cluster, and a head-up display are standard on higher trim levels of the Tahoe.
Interior Room And Cargo Capacity
The Toyota Sequoia is a three-row SUV that comes standard with eight seats and a 2+3+3 seating arrangement, or it may be purchased with seven seats and a 2+2+3 seating arrangement. The Toyota Sequoia boasts a large trunk space volume, with 22.3 cubic feet of conventional storage behind the third row. In a reclined position, the Sequoia provides up to 49 cubic feet of space. The 2024 Sequoia has a maximum load volume of 86.9 cubic feet with the second row is folded down.
The 2024 Chevrolet Tahoe is marketed as a three-row SUV with seven or eight seat options, just like the Sequoia. In terms of dimensions, the Chevy Tahoe is two inches longer, two inches wider, and the same height as the Toyota Sequoia. Nevertheless, the Tahoe offers an impressive cargo volume of 122.9 cubic feet when the second and third rows are folded down, in addition to 25.5 cubic feet behind the third row and 72.6 cubic feet behind the second row.
Cargo Space Comparison
Toyota Sequoia
Chevrolet Tahoe
Behind 1st Row
86.9 Cubic-Feet
122.9 Cubic-Feet
Behind 2nd Row
49 Cubic-Feet
72.6 Cubic-Feet
Behind 3rd Row
22.3 Cubic-Feet
25.5 Cubic-Feet
Safety And Reliability
The NHTSA and IIHS have not conducted crash tests or safety evaluations for the 2024 Toyota Sequoia. The 2024 Chevrolet Tahoe has not undergone crash testing by the IIHS, however it has undergone testing by the NHTSA, which gave the SUV an overall four-star rating.
Toyota Sequoia Safety
NHTSA 5-Star Safety Ratings
Overall Rating
NA
Overall Front Crash Rating
NA
Overall Side Crash Rating
NA
Rollover Rating
NA
Recalls (NHTSA): # 1
NHTSA Investigations: # 0
NHTSA Consumer Complaints: 0
Awards: NA
Chevrolet Tahoe Safety
NHTSA 5-Star Safety Ratings
Overall Rating
4 out of 5
Overall Front Crash Rating
4 out of 5
Overall Side Crash Rating
5 out of 5
Rollover Rating
4 out of 5
Recalls (NHTSA): # 0
NHTSA Investigations: # 0
NHTSA Consumer Complaints: # 2
Awards: NA
Reliability Comparison
Every new Toyota car comes with a three-year/36,000-mile basic warranty, a five-year/60,000-mile drivetrain guarantee, a five-year corrosion warranty, and a two-year roadside assistance policy. On the other hand, a 3 year/36, 000 mile basic warranty, a 5 year/60,000 mile drivetrain guarantee, a 3 year/100, 000 mile corrosion warranty, and a 5 year/60,000 mile roadside assistance coverage are all included with new Chevrolet vehicles.
Warranty
Vehicle
Toyota Sequoia
Chevrolet Tahoe
Basic Warranty
3 Years / 36,000 Miles
3 Years / 36,000 Miles
Drivetrain Warranty
5 Years / 60,000 Miles
5 Years / 60,000 Miles
Corrosion Warranty
5 Years / Unlimited Miles
3 Years / 100,000 Miles
Roadside Assistance
2 Years / Unlimited Miles
5 Years / 60,000 Miles
Pricing And Availability
There are five trim levels for the 2024 Toyota Sequoia: SR5, Limited, Platinum, Capstone, and TRD Pro. Starting at $61,275, the SR5 model of the Sequoia is available. For $67,675, the Sequoia Limited model includes options including a larger 14-inch touchscreen, heated steering wheel, and heated and ventilated front seats. Upgrading to the $73,865 Sequoia Platinum, the trim comes with a panoramic sunroof, wireless smartphone charging pad, second-row captain’s seats, and improved LED headlights. At $78,265 the Sequoia Capstone is equipped with sound-absorbing windows, 22-inch wheels, a head-up display, and premium leather seating.At $79,110, the most costly model of the Sequoia lineup, the off-road-focused TRD Pro comes with an electronic locking rear differential, TRD-tuned off-road suspension with Fox shock absorbers, and a front skid plate
Six trim levels are available for the 2024 Chevrolet Tahoe: LS, LT, RST, Z71, Premier, and High Country. The base price of the Chevy Tahoe LS is $58,195. At $63,695, the Tahoe LT has leather upholstery and greater inside technology. In addition to the Performance Package and enormous 22-inch wheels, the $66,295 Tahoe RST also comes with visual upgrades. The most off-road competent variant is the $68,295 Tahoe Z71. A more upscale interior is available in the $71,595 Tahoe Premier model, which includes heated front and rear seats, a heated steering wheel, magnetically controlled shock absorbers for improved ride quality, and other features. At $77,395 the most expensive variant of the Chevy SUV is the premium Tahoe High Country.
The release date for the mystery project starring Michael B. Jordan and Ryan Coogler, which is slated to premiere in theaters next year, has been announced.
The pair, who previously worked together on Fruitvale Station, Creed, Black Panther, and Black Panther: Wakanda Forever, will reunite on the untitled movie.
The movie will be released on March 7, 2025, according to Deadline, despite the fact that it does not yet have a title or a solid premise.
Although there aren’t many details available at this time, Coogler is credited with writing the script from an original concept, and the tale is rumored to have a “period element.”
In their most recent project together, Jordan made an unexpected cameo in Wakanda Forever, when he played Killmonger again. The actor was able to keep this information a secret from everyone, even his own family.
He said on The Tonight Show with Jimmy Fallon, “It’s tough, I think this time around because we lost our brother Chadwick [Boseman]. It was so much weight to power through.”
“Ryan had such a tremendous task in front of him to evolve the script and the story in a way that still honoured Chadwick but moved the franchise forward as well.”
“So for me to be able to come back – and I really had to keep it under wraps, I had to grow my hair out. You know, I got the locks back in and stuff like that.”
“And I’m traveling to a lot of places, so I’ve got to wear a hat, a hoodie, fly private, which isn’t too bad of a thing. But being able to keep it under wraps was really a tough thing.”
The fourth generation Swift was just released by Maruti Suzuki in India. According to recent sources, the business may introduce a new CNG variant to the Swift lineup in the upcoming months. With the new Z12E engine, the forthcoming Swift CNG is anticipated to get a mileage of more than 32 km/kg.
New Maruti Swift CNG: what to expect
All of Maruti Suzuki’s Arena vehicles come with a CNG version. Thus, the Swift will soon have the option to run on compressed natural gas (CNG), and if it has the most recent Z12E engine, it will be the first car to run on CNG to be powered by the new engine. The power and torque output of the petrol-CNG engine will be somewhat less than when operating just on CNG. The manual gearbox will also be available with the CNG version.
The newly released 2024 Maruti Swift is the first vehicle in the class to be equipped with a new 1.2-liter, three-cylinder, naturally aspirated petrol engine, producing 112Nm of torque and 82 horsepower. A 5-speed manual gearbox or an optional 5-speed AMT are available to match the powerplant.
According to the manufacturer, the new Swift has a fuel efficiency of up to 25.75 kpl when equipped with an automatic gearbox and 24.80 kpl when equipped with a manual gearbox. In the meantime, a mileage of more than 32 km/kg is anticipated for the Swift CNG. When it launches, it will compete with vehicles like the Tata Tiago CNG choices and the Hyundai Grand i10 Nios.
Price
The current pricing range for the new 2024 Swift (ex-showroom) is Rs 6.49 lakh to Rs 9.64 lakh. Following launch, the CNG model is anticipated to cost between Rs 90,00 and Rs 95,000 more than the similar fuel variants.
Entrepreneurs have existed in society since agriculturists traded their first stone tools with neighbouring states. According to the World History Encyclopedia, Lydians first minted coins as a method of payment. From here, different businesses and startups took shape. So, what’s the difference between startup vs. small business?
With the inclusion of technology, the business model has been diversified. The Startup-Book.com says that the term start-up dates back to 1550. In 1976, Forbes Magazine first used this term for budding company. After that, we begin to hear this term everywhere. Especially today, when some try to think outside of the traditional mode of making money at the expense of the exploitation of corporate sectors, the “Startup” idea pops into mind.
For every investor who wants to take the initiative, it is a must to learn about the basics first. It may involve learning finance, marketing strategies, business plans, defining goals, etc. Above all if you are just starting from scratch, you should be aware of startups vs small businesses. Keep reading for the successful completion of business aspirations.
5 Differences between Startup Vs. Small Business
The term start-up is mostly confused with small business. Both terms differ from each other. Although the end goal is similar, i.e., generating profit, they are still different branches of a similar tree trunk. Below are the key differences provided by the experts of The Academic Papers UK for a better understanding.
1. Vision
The company vision is the most prominent factor in understanding small business vs. startup. A startup is not only concerned with introducing a product in the market but also with popularising it across the globe. For this purpose, the investor becomes more creative in introducing ideas that can surround the global market.
On the other hand, in startup vs. small business, the latter is just concerned with marketing the product within a defined paradigm. Therefore, they serve the local market and make wealthy ties with other investors within their community.
2. Funding
To startup a small business, the funding is mostly taken from the capitalists who can make even millions of investments at a time. This is how they receive the equity in the business and get profit along with the owner. For starting a small business, traditional loans are taken from banks or online lenders. In return, they make money by charging interest from small business owners.
3. Growth
It may define the significant difference between scalable startups and small businesses. A start-up needs to grow as quickly as possible so that it can replace the top-line business model in the market. We see startups mostly in the technology industry. On the contrary, small businesses are more concerned with building profit rather than expanding it. They look for the growth pattern that can create sustainable business.
4. Profit
A startup may not generate profit for years. The final goal is to raise the company profile to the upper scale even if it does not generate income immediately. For small businesses, investors are not supposed to worry about this. They are just following a well-established business model that has to pay back little or more.
The startup vs. small business Reddit explains that investors made exponential profits when they made an effort to diversify their small businesses rather than start-ups. However, for some, the start-up was a good source of future financial sustainability.
5. Leadership
It is said that there are three different goals for labour in a startup vs. small business. It can make you an artist, a manager or an entrepreneur. A start-up can be run by true entrepreneurs who are energetic, vision makers, and, most importantly, risk takers.
However, a small business is made by an artist who wants to use their skills to inspire others. Remember that you don’t need to define your capabilities via these mere markers. Anyone can take any initiative if they realise their true business identity.
Startup Vs. Small Business Pros and Cons
When making a decision, it is important to understand the pros and cons. Here, we define their strengths and weaknesses, which can offer valuable information to achieve success in both endeavours.
Pros of startup:
It has the potential for rapid growth.
It generates significant wealth for founders and investors.
It offers innovative ideas.
It offers innovative treatments in the healthcare sector to advance it.
It attracts the investors to achieve their rapid growth.
Cons of Start-Up:
It has a high risk of uncertainty.
It may not generate the revenue.
It may encounter difficulties in its operations in areas such as management, hiring, and retaining talent.
Due to its nature, it may offer long hours of high stress to the investors.
The founders are mostly working tirelessly to meet the tight deadlines.
It mainly operates with limited resources.
Pros of Small Business:
A small business is an integral part of the economy.
It provides a sense of security to the owners and employees.
It allows owners to have deep connections with customers.
It can quickly adapt to sudden changes in the market.
It grants a sense of ownership and control over work setup.
It offers good ties with the local community.
It can provide support to the community.
It offers a deep commitment to the business goals.
Cons of Small Business:
It has limited growth potential.
The focus is on quality rather than quantity.
The investors mostly struggle to secure their funding.
Small business owners often face heavy workloads.
You may lack a mentor who can provide you with proper guidance for your business operations.
Startup Vs. Small Business Examples
Starting a business can be exciting, but deciding which one to launch can be a difficult decision. Below are examples of scalable startups vs. small businesses so that you may not be confused.
Start-Up Examples:
In this modern world, where everyone is concerned about bringing innovation, a good idea may lead to a good start-up. The following are some ideas that you just need to know about startups vs. small businesses.
Making an online grocery store.
Make a podcast to define your communication skills.
You can make an online language-learning app.
Small Business Examples:
A good small business idea may be hard to define, but with some planning and preparation, you can create an excellent small business setup.
Handy work.
Woodworkers.
Sewing specialist.
Freelance developer.
Conclusion
Are you embarking on the journey of starting a business? Have you made the initial arrangements for the successful operation of the ideas? If so, then don’t forget to include the understanding of startup vs. small business in your list. Many people confuse the term, and most of them consider it similar. In this write-up, we have highlighted the key differences between both ideas.
In the success of any business, marketing plays a crucial role. The better you can define your product specifications to the customers, the better it will be in retaining their attention. Business owners use different strategies to market it to a third person, and compile the progress in the papers. If you are a student and your professor has assigned you an assignment to write on the difference between a startup and a small business, but you find it difficult to write it yourself. In this situation hiring an assignment writing services can offer valuable solutions to your concerns.
A helium leak in the spacecraft’s propulsion system has forced NASA and Boeing to postpone the company’s CST-100 Starliner’s first crewed mission once more.
NASA said in a statement late on May 17 that the Crew Flight Test (CFT) mission, which was originally slated for May 21, has been rescheduled to no sooner than May 25 at 3:09 p.m. Eastern in order to continue work on a leak in the spacecraft’s helium pressurization system.
The most recent postponement occurred three days after NASA and Boeing announced that they would be postponing the launch, which was originally planned for May 17, in order to fix a thruster in the spacecraft’s service module that was leaking helium. At the time, Boeing stated that it was trying to better characterize the leak and build a flight justification to fly the system as-is without repairing the flange. The leak was found to be related to a flange in one thruster.
NASA stated in the announcement of the additional postponement that “pressure testing performed on May 15 on the spacecraft’s helium system showed the leak in the flange is stable and would not pose a risk at that level during the flight.” “Boeing teams are working to develop operational procedures to ensure the system retains sufficient performance capability and appropriate redundancy during the flight.”
In order to “review the data and procedures to make a final determination before proceeding to flight countdown.” NASA stated that both the commercial crew and International Space Station programs will need to take a few days to study the data and procedures.
The statement followed hours of conjecture that the mission, which has seen years of total setbacks due to numerous technical issues with spaceship components ranging from valves to parachutes, was about to experience yet another postponement. Regarding the helium leak, Boeing has not addressed previous inquiries and has not offered much more information.
Industry sources claim that the leak was discovered during the May 6 countdown, which was canceled due to an unrelated Atlas 5 Centaur upper stage valve problem. It was uncertain if the launch could have gone forward if the valve had operated correctly.
During a briefing following the May 6 scrub, Mark Nappi, the vice president of Boeing and the company’s Starliner program manager, made no mention of the helium leak or any other problems with the spacecraft. At the time, he declared, “Today was a good dry run for the entire process.” Launch preparations proceeded as planned until roughly two hours before the planned liftoff. “We were ahead of schedule, about 45 minutes ahead of schedule, so the teams did an excellent job.”
“A lot of things have to go right. It’s not the majority of the things; everything has to go right before we launch,” he continued.
Coach Rick Carlisle questioned the officials after the Indiana Pacers trailed the New York Knicks 2-0 in their series. He posed a direct challenge to his players as they were about to lose Friday’s Game 6.
Following their thirty-point defeat in Game 5 in New York, Carlisle ripped into his squad, demanding that they increase their focus, intensity, and technique. Then, on Thursday, he put them through a taxing film session where they watched clip after clip of the Knicks humiliatingly defeating the Pacers.
With a 116-103 victory in Game 6, the Pacers leveled the series at 3-3 and set up a Game 7 on Sunday at Madison Square Garden. The seasoned coach received a great response from his young team.
The Pacers won the rebounding battle by 12 in Game 6 after dropping it by a massive 24 in Game 5. In Game 6, the Pacers turned the ball over just nine times, compared to a devastating eighteen times in Game 5. Additionally, the Pacers outscored the Knicks by 24 points in Game 6 after being defeated by 26 points in the paint in Game 5.
Tyrese Haliburton of the Pacers, a guard with nine assists and fifteen points, remarked, “I think the biggest thing was that coaches challenged our effort,” “We had some boneheaded things happen [in Game 5]. … He just really challenged our group [players] 1-15 on how can we be better.”
The Knicks’ post-loss focus was not only on the upcoming Game 7 but also on valued player Josh Hart, who toiled through the game until eventually making an appearance in the fourth quarter after suffering an abdominal injury while attempting to grab a rebound in the first quarter on Friday night. Even though he played close to forty minutes and pulled down eight rebounds, he was not the same powerful player as usual.
Hart, who at one point in the series played 144 straight minutes, scared his teammates when he needed to leave the game twice in order to stretch and apply heating pads to his left side of the abdomen. Under his clothing, Knicks trainers put together a web-like arrangement of kinesio tape in an attempt to provide him with some respite.
Hart departed the game without talking to media, thus Knicks coach Tom Thibodeau was unable to provide an update following the contest. To a man, though, his Knicks teammates stated that they anticipated he would play despite Sunday afternoon’s short turnaround.
“I would assume he’s going to play,” Jalen Brunson, a star player for the Knicks, stated. “It’s Game 7.”
Miles McBride stated, “Him asking out is not a good sign, but I think he’ll bounce back,”
“Knowing him, he’ll do whatever to play,” Isaiah Hartenstein remarked. “If his leg’s not falling off, he’ll do whatever to play.”
Another question is how well Hart might be able to play.
Attackers on Hart and the other Knicks interior defenders included center Myles Turner (17 points) and forward Pascal Siakam (25 points in his best game of the series).
“It was just activity. We played harder tonight, which was a must,” Carlisle remarked. “We moved the ball better and we got more rebounds, and that’s obviously a big key to the series.”
For the last two weeks, Brunson has been at the focus of a lot of the teams’ planning and competition. The Pacers’ strategy of switching defenders and exposing the Knicks’ weaknesses through lineup changes has essentially shaped the series.
In contrast to Game 5, when the Knicks were able to consistently break Brunson away from his grip, Aaron Nesmith, who has drawn the starting assignment in the previous four games, was more aggressive in his fighting over and around screens. Particularly early in the game on Friday, Brunson had less space, and even when he did receive clear shots, he misfired.
After making his first two baskets in the opening quarter, Brunson missed his next eleven, for a 2-of-13 shooting clip that represented the worst half of his postseason career.
Although the Knicks were already behind more than 20 points when he started, he rebounded in the second half and managed to break free from Nesmith, scoring 26 of his 31 points and making 9 of his 13 attempts.
T.J. McConnell, a reserve guard for the Pacers who scored 15 points off the bench, contributed to the attack on Brunson as well.
According to Brunson, “they try to make things difficult.” “And I have to adjust as well. Show me different looks and I have to do a better job of reading it.”
However, the Pacers didn’t believe they had Brunson figured out. In this series, he has already scored 40 points twice at home, and the majority of the Pacers’ star players will be present for their first Game 7.
“We gotta brace for Sunday. We know the kind of effort [Brunson] is going to bring on Sunday,” Carlisle remarked. “And we must be ready.”
In its earnings report for FY 2023–24, Mahindra & Mahindra recently disclosed that, during the just ended fiscal year, the company’s overall earnings for the whole automotive division amounted to Rs 76,156 crores. This resulted in a 24% increase in revenue over the prior fiscal year.
Additionally, the carmaker reported revenue of Rs 20,908 crore for the fourth quarter of the fiscal year that ended, representing a YoY increase of 22% over the same period in the prior fiscal year. Mahindra also provided information about its future goods during yesterday’s earnings call.
Mahindra to launch 16 new SUVs by 2030
By 2030, Mahindra plans to introduce up to 16 new SUVs into the passenger car market. Nine vehicles with combustion engines and seven with all-electric propulsion are included in this. Three of the seven combustion SUVs—including the recently released XUV 3XO—will be mid-cycle facelifts of current models, with the other three being completely new models.
In the upcoming years, Mahindra is anticipated to introduce updated versions of the XUV 700 and Scorpio N in addition to the XUV 3XO. The first of the all-new vehicles to hit the market will be the 5-door Thar, which is reported to be dubbed Thar Armada. It is scheduled to make its world premiere on August 15 of this year.
Mahindra is set to introduce seven new battery electric vehicle (BEV) models, including the Born Electric XUV.e8, XUV.e9, BE.05, BE.07, and BE.09 variants. Mahindra’s Born Electric SUVs will all be built on the INGLO architecture, albeit with different motor and battery options. By the end of this year, Mahindra is anticipated to start producing these SUVs, starting with the XUV.e8.
In addition to the aforementioned models, Mahindra is developing an all-electric Thar variant; a design for the vehicle was unveiled in August of last year. Additionally, it has been rumoured that Mahindra has submitted trademark applications for the XUV 1XO and XUV 5XO, which will be positioned below and above the XUV 3XO, respectively.
Production capacity expansion
Mahindra has a 39,000 unit monthly production capacity for passenger cars at the end of FY2023. The capacity increases to 49,000 units per month by the end of FY 2024.
By the conclusion of FY2025, Mahindra plans to increase its capacity by an additional 64,000 units per month. This entails a 5,000 rise in combustion SUVs and a 10,000 increase in EVs.
Maruti Suzuki has said that it will introduce a CNG version of the fourth-generation Swift in India.
The Z12E engine, a 1.2-liter, three-cylinder, naturally aspirated petrol engine with 82 horsepower and 112 Nm, will be available in this new model.
A 5-speed manual gearbox and a 5-speed automated manual gearbox (AMT) are the two possible gearbox options for the Z12E motor.
Swift CNG to be first Maruti car with new engine
The new Z12E engine will be installed in the Swift CNG, the first Maruti Suzuki car in India.
When running in pure CNG mode, this engine produces somewhat less power and torque, which makes it distinctive.
With the addition of this engine, Maruti Suzuki has achieved a major milestone by increasing the selection of its fuel-efficient cars.
Pricing and fuel efficiency
The new Swift is currently available priced between ₹6.49 lakh and ₹9.64 lakh (ex-showroom).
But the CNG trims should cost roughly ₹90,000–95,000 more than the equivalent petrol versions.
Impressive mileage estimates for the new Swift are available: 25.75 km/liter for an automatic gearbox and 24.80 km/liter for a manual gearbox.
The Swift CNG is expected to exceed the Hyundai Grand i10 Nios and Tata Tiago, which are competitors that also provide CNG choices, with a predicted mileage of more than 32 km/kg.
